Prezista®: darunavir/ritonavir
Prezcobix®: darunavir/cobicistat
Symtuza®: darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)
Protease inhibitor with potent in vitro activity against both wild-type HIV-1 and a large panel of viruses resistant to currently licensed protease inhibitors.
It is a sulfonamide; according to the manufacturer, no cross-sensitivity was observed in subjects with sulfonamide allergy. However, in one cohort study, the incidence of allergic reaction to darunavir in patients with a history of sulfa allergy was higher (odds ratio 4.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.05–17.56)2932. Use with caution in patients with a known sulfonamide allergy.
Molecular weight: 547.656 (active moiety), 593.724 (TMC114-ethanolate)
In vitro EC50 4.2 nM (2.5 ng/mL), EC90 10 nM (5.5 ng/mL). Comparative EC50 values were found against WT-HIV1 and multi-PI-resistant primary isolates. The EC50 value of darunavir increases by a median factor of 5.4 in the presence of human serum. EC50WT is approximately 55 ng/mL.
Prezista ® :
75 mg (white) tablets, DIN 02338432
150 mg (white) tablets, DIN 02369753
400 mg (light orange) tablets, DIN 02324057 (discontinued in Canada)
600 mg (orange) tablets, DIN 02324024
800 mg (dark red) tablets, DIN 02393050
100 mg/mL oral suspension (available in U.S. and Europe)- in Canada via Compassionate Access through Janssen Canada (call Janssen Medical Information at 1-800-567-3331 or submit Compassionate Use for posted on company website https://www.janssenmedicalinformation.ca/login?destination=compassionate-use ;updated Feb 2020). Store at room temperature. Shake well before use.
Store oral suspension at room temperature. Shake well before use.
300 mg (orange) tablets, DIN 02284057 – discontinued
Prezcobix®: fixed dose combination of darunavir 800 mg and cobicistat 150 mg pink oval-shaped, film-coated tablet, DIN 02426501
100 mg/mL oral suspension: (US only or compassionate access through Janssen Canada (call Janssen Medical Information at 1-800-567-3331 or submit Compassionate Use for posted on company website https://www.janssenmedicalinformation.ca/login?destination=compassionate-use ;updated Feb 2020). Store at room temperature. Shake well before use.
See darunavir and ritonavir for other liquid options (substitution of cobicistat with ritonavir may be required).
Prezista®:
No pharmacokinetic data are available on chewing or crushing of Prezista® film-coated tablets. However, since the tablets are not formulated as an extended release formulation, no potential problem is anticipated if the tablets are chewed or crushed for administration through a nasogastric (NG) tube. It is unlikely that chewing or crushing Prezista® tablets would have a significant impact on pharmacokinetics (Data on File, Tibotec, November 2006).
In two patients, one with dysphagia and Candida esophagitis and one with a stomach tube, who received darunavir tablets crushed and dissolved and administered with ritonavir oral solution, adequate plasma darunavir levels were achieved along with good virologic response.2953
A case report describes an intubated 44 year old man on tenofovir/emtricitabine, darunavir, and ritonavir in ICU who was given darunavir tablets via orogastric tube crushed and dissolved in 15-20 mL of water. Viral load did not change significantly and adequate darunavir trough levels were achieved.2941
An HIV-positive patient on continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) received raltegravir 400 mg BID, darunavir 600/100 mg BID, zidovudine 300 mg BID and 3TC 50 mg q24h in suspension via gastric port and simultaneous enteral feeding via the duodenal port of a double-lumen nasogastroduodenal tube. Pharmacokinetic sampling and analysis indicated that darunavir and raltegravir were removed by CVVHDF with approximately the same clearance as provided by a normally functioning kidney. Absorption of both darunavir and raltegravir after suspension and application via the gastric port with continued administration of feed via the duodenal port of the double-lumen tube was good. As such, dose adjustments are not required for patients receiving darunavir and/or raltegravir while undergoing CVVHDF and that absorption of darunavir and raltegravir is not significantly affected by postpyloric enteral feeding.2958
Prezcobix®:
The chemical stability of crushed Prezcobix (2 tablets crushed and suspended in 20 mL Syrspend® and 1% w/v CMC solution) was evaluated. Darunavir and cobicistat remained within ±20% of the initial value for 7 days when stored at 4C and at room temperature (~25C).3546
Tablets are immediate-release formulation; no anticipated absorption issues if the tablets are chewed, split or crushed.3211
Symtuza®:
Symtuza® should be swallowed whole. The manufacturer does not recommend breaking or crushing Symtuza® to ensure administration of the entire dose. Film-coated tablets.3101
The relative bioavailability of darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) single tablet regimen was compared with the tablet administered whole, split or crushed. In the split group there was an 11% decrease in TAF Cmax only (not clinically relevant). In the crushed group there was a 17% decrease in the emtricitabine Cmax and TAF Cmax and AUC were decreased by 29% and 18%, respectively (clinical relevance not assessed, but impact expected to be minimal based on wide therapeutic window for TAF).2864
Prezista®:
For treatment-experienced patients: 600/100 mg ritonavir po BID with food.
For treatment naïve patients or those with no darunavir resistance-associated mutations (RAMS): 800/100mg ritonavir po once daily with food.
In a multicentre open-label study (n=100) patients virally suppressed on darunavir 800/100 mg QD plus 2 NRTIs were randomized to continue on darunavir 800/100 mg QD or switched to darunavir 600/100 mg QD. At week 48, darunavir Ctrough levels were similar between treatment arms and the reduced darunavir dose showed non-inferior virologic efficacy to the standard dose arm. CD4 cell counts remained stable in both groups.2950
Prezcobix®: 1 tablet daily with food.
Symtuza®: 1 tablet daily with food.
Darunavir (DRV) should not be used without a pharmacokinetic (PK) enhancer (boosting agent). Ritonavir (RTV) may be used as the boosting agent in children and adults. Cobicistat (COBI) may be used as a boosting agent with DRV in children weighing ≥40 kg and in adults.
Neonate/ Infant:
Pediatric (3 years to < 12 years and weighing ≥ 10 kg) treatment naive or treatment-experienced with or without one or more darunavir resistance-associated mutations (RAMs):
Adolescent (≥ 12 years):
Adult (> 18 years):
Prezcobix®:
Adolescent (≥ 40 kg) and Adult dose:
Take with food.
Population pharmacokinetic analysis in HIV-infected subjects (n=20) with moderate renal impairment (Clcr 30-60 mL/min) showed that darunavir pharmacokinetics were not significantly affected. There are currently no pharmacokinetic data of darunavir in HIV-infected subjects with severe renal impairment or endstage renal disease; however a significant increase in darunavir would not be expected in such subjects, due to the limited renal clearance of darunavir.
Use in hemodialysis:
Antiretroviral pharmacokinetics were studied in a 49-year old HIV-positive man virologically suppressed on darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily, etravirine 200 mg twice daily and raltegravir 400 mg twice daily while undergoing hemodialysis three times weekly. The morning dose of the antiretrovirals was taken after completion of the 4-hour morning hemodialysis session. After dialysis, darunavir, etravirine, raltegravir and ritonavir concentrations were decreased by 57%, 29%, 82% and 60%, respectively compared to predialysis levels. A supplemental dose of 600 mg darunavir administered prior to the hemodialysis session was successful in restoring darunavir concentrations approximately equal to expected levels, while administration of a supplemental dose of raltegravir 400 mg was not, likely due to wide intra- and inter-patient variability. Dose supplementation of etravirine was not deemed necessary given the relatively low amount removed during hemodialysis. After 1 year of therapy, the patient maintained viral suppression.1847
An HIV-positive patient on continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) received raltegravir 400 mg BID, darunavir 600/100 mg BID, zidovudine 300 mg BID and 3TC 50 mg q24h in suspension via gastric port and simultaneous enteral feeding via the duodenal port of a double-lumen nasogastroduodenal tube. Pharmacokinetic sampling and analysis indicated that darunavir and raltegravir were removed by CVVHDF with approximately the same clearance as provided by a normally functioning kidney. Absorption of both drugs after suspension and application via the gastric port with continued administration of feed via the duodenal port of the double-lumen tube was good. As such, dose adjustments are not required for patients receiving darunavir and/or raltegravir while undergoing CVVHDF and that absorption of darunavir and raltegravir is not significantly affected by postpyloric enteral feeding.2958
In a 42 year old male on hemodialysis 3 times weekly, darunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg and doravirine 100 mg were administered once daily after breakfast. Antiviral TDM was performed before and after hemodialysis. Doravirine trough concentrations were approximately 6% lower after hemodialysis, suggesting some removal by hemodialysis. However, overall doravirine concentrations were relatively high compared to historical controls, likely due to inhibiting effects of darunavir/cobicistat. Trough concentrations of darunavir and cobicistat were similar on days with and without dialysis. The patient remained virally suppressed with follow-up out to day 111.3524
CrCl (mL/min) for men: 〈(140 - age) (weight kg) x 60〉 / 〈(serum creatinine umol/L) (50)〉 CrCl (mL/min) for women: as above multiplied by 0.85 |
The pharmacokinetics and safety of darunavir 600 mg/ritonavir 100 mg BID for 7 days was assessed in HIV-negative volunteers with mild (Child-Pugh class A, n=8) and moderate (Child Pugh class B, n=8) hepatic impairment and compared with HIV-negative, healthy control volunteers (n=16).
There were no differences in levels of either drug in subjects with mild hepatic impairment and controls (least square mean (LSM) ratios (90% confidence intervals) for DRV exposure (AUC12h), maximum (Cmax) and minimum (Cmin) plasma concentrations were 0.94 (0.75–1.17), 0.88 (0.73–1.07) and 0.83 (0.63–1.10), respectively).
In those with moderate hepatic impairment there was approximately 20% increase in AUC for DRV, and levels of RTV were increased approximately 50% compared to healthy controls but neither increase was considered clinically significant.
In conclusion, no dose adjustments of DRV/r are needed in individuals with mild or moderate liver impairment.
In an open-label observational study of 11 HIV+ and 13 HIV/hepatitis B or C (Child Pugh score < 6) receiving darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg BID, no significant association between extent of liver fibrosis and darunavir kinetics was observed. Median darunavir AUC12 was 41.7 mg.h/L in HIV+/HEP+ vs. 42.6 in HIV+ patients, p=0649. Median darunavir Ctrough was 2.7 mg/L and 2.0, respectively, p=0.776.2951
The kinetics of raltegravir and darunavir were studied in five HIV-HCV co-infected patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment (2 with chronic active hepatitis, 3 with cirrhosis). Plasma Ctrough samples were collected at days 14 and 30 after this new regimen was initiated; 24 matched HIV-1 patients with normal liver function treated with raltegravir and darunavir were used as a control group. Mean darunavir Ctrough was 8519 vs. 3236 ng/mL in controls. Mean darunavir Ctrough was consistently higher in cirrhotic vs. non-cirrhotic patients (9820 vs. 2016 ng/mL, respectively). No differences in viral/immunologic outcome or safety parameters were found between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients. Use darunavir with caution in patients with moderate to severe liver impairment because of the risk of additive toxicity.2960
Kinetics of darunavir 800/100 mg QD and 600/100 mg BID in HIV-HCV coinfected patients with hepatic cirrhosis (74% Child-Pugh A, median MELD score 9), total serum unbound darunavir concentrations were similar to historical data in non-cirrhotic patients2937. Dose adjustments not necessary.
Darunavir/cobicistat:
Bioavailability ↑ 30% when taken in fed conditions with ritonavir versus fasting conditions. Type of meal (standard breakfast, high-fat breakfast, nutritional protein drink, croissant + coffee) had very little impact on exposure.
Oral suspension for pediatric use (100 mg/mL) is under development2954. Bioavailability of the suspension is similar with or without food.
Darunavir/cobicistat/FTC/TAF:
Exposures of darunavir and cobicistat are reduced by 30-45% and 16-30% in fasted versus fed state, while TAF exposure was marginally reduced by 10-20% by fasting state. FTC exposure was unchanged.2935
In a case series, three patients on darunavir/ritonavir underwent sleeve gastrectomy. All three patients maintained virologic suppression after gastrectomy. 3394
In a case report, HIV was diagnosed in a man 11 months following RYGB surgery. When the patient presented for care of his HIV, his HIV-1 RNA was 146 138 copies/mL (5.20 log) and his CD4 T cell count was 320 cells/mm(3) (25%). He was initiated on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg once daily, emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg once daily, and darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 600/100 mg twice daily. ARV concentrations were similar to historical data. Six months following ARV initiation, HIV-1 RNA was suppressed. 3396
A case report described a patient who underwent sleeve gastrectomy and was found to have a darunavir trough concentration of 2270 ng/mL (reference trough is 2200 ± 1100 ng/mL) on a dose of 800 mg daily, in combination with ritonavir, raltegravir, abacavir and lamivudine. 3170
In a case series of 17 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy, most of the antiretrovirals, including lamivudine, abacavir, darunavir, tenofovir and emtricitabine exhibited adequate plasma concentrations both at baseline and during follow-up at 3- and 6-month post-surgery.3625 However, raltegravir in 4 patients showed a large inter-individual variability of Cmax and AUC at baseline and at 6-month post-surgery. In one patient, the AUC of raltegravir at baseline (4753 μg / h l) and at 6-month post-surgery (5274 μg / h l) were both below literature standards (14,000-26,460 μg / h l). Atazanavir Cmax and AUC in 3 patients were also under the literature standard values and worsened post-surgery (n = 2). Ritonavir Cmax and AUC were within normal range post-surgery (n =3). Among the 17 patients, 12 (70%) maintained undetectable viral load during follow-up. Those patients were on lamivudine, abacavir, tenofovir, and emtricitabine among other antiretrovirals that were not assayed. Four patients on raltegravir or atazanavir had viral rebound after surgery, requiring treatment modification which led to undetectable viral load.
A case report described a 43-year-old woman virally suppressed on once-daily darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and TDF 245 mg. After undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), dosages of emtricitabine and TDF were kept the same, but darunavir/ritonavir was increased to 600/100 mg BID in anticipation of potential change in antiretroviral drug exposure after RYGB. Compared with reference PK, darunavir AUC, Cmax, and Cmin 3 days post-surgery were reduced by 50, 14, and 67%, whereas darunavir exposure 10 weeks post-surgery was comparable with reference. Ritonavir AUC, Cmax, and Cmin 3 days post-surgery were decreased by 67, 67, and 76%, whereas ritonavir PKs were increased by 104, 119, and 135% 10 weeks post-surgery. As a result of normal drug exposures 10 weeks post-surgery, darunavir/ritonavir was changed back to once daily darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg. One year post-surgery, TDM showed adequate levels of darunavir/ritonavir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir (changed to tenofovir alafenamide) (3140/298; 147 and 11 ng/mL, 14 hours after administration). Patient maintained viral suppression throughout.3648
May be coadministered with omeprazole or ranitidine.
Darunavir is an inhibitor of CYP3A4. Darunavir/r may induce CYP2C9, 2C19. Darunavir/r may possibly inhibit CYP2D6.
Absolute oral bioavailability: 37% (alone) and 82% (after coadministration with ritonavir 100 mg BID)
Oral suspension for pediatric use (100 mg/mL) is under development2954. When coadministered with low-dose ritonavir, exposures comparable to that of darunavir tablets are noted.
95% (humans), primarily alpha-1-acid glycoprotein
2.5-4 hours when given fed with ritonavir 100 mg BID
~ 15 hours when combined with ritonavir. 10.9-17.2 hours for various dosing regimens; ritonavir did not influence t1/2.
Substrate and inhibitor of CYP3A4.
After single dose administration of darunavir 400/ritonavir 100 mg, 79.5% and 13.9% of the administered dose of 14C-darunavir was recovered in the feces and urine, respectively.
Adult population PK (HIV-positive subjects):
Pediatric population PK:
Darunavir 800mg/100mg daily for 7 days: conc remained above the protein-binding corrected in-vitro EC50 55ng/ml for ≥ 48 hours in healthy volunteers after last dose was administered.2931
Based on PK sampling data from the GRACE study, exposure to darunavir was not influenced by age, body weight, hepatitis B co-infection status, or use of etravirine or tenofovir. There were no clinically relevant differences in exposure to darunavir according to race or gender2945. In healthy volunteers (n=23) who had previously participated in a pravastatin-darunavir/ritonavir interaction study, CYP3A5 and ABCB1 polymorphisms were not associated with variability in darunavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics.2961
Darunavir concentrations were compared in 34 time-matched blood plasma and seminal plasma samples from 18 HIV-positive men. Good penetration of darunavir into the seminal fluid was observed, with concentrations approximately 10-20% of blood plasma levels. All seminal plasma darunavir were above the protein-corrected EC50 values for wild-type HIV-1 (55 ng/mL), and a third of all seminal plasma darunavir levels exceeded the protein-corrected EC50 required to inhibit protease inhibitor resistant HIV-1 (550 ng/mL).2959
Intracellular darunavir concentrations are approximately 5-times higher than plasma concentrations, and are significantly correlated with plasma ritonavir exposures2939. In healthy volunteers who received either darunavir 900/100 mg QD or efavirenz 600 mg QD alone or in combination, intracellular concentrations of both darunavir and efavirenz were significantly increased when the drugs were coadministered: intracellular darunavir AUC ↑ 124% and Cmax ↑ 163% and intracellular efavirenz C24h ↑ 139%.2957
In a cross-sectional TDM database review of non-pregnant HIV-infected adults taking darunavir 800/100 mg QD, darunavir C24h obtained after morning dosing were significantly higher than those after evening dosing (1632 vs 1433 ng/mL, respectively, p < 0.0001). The difference was more pronounced in women vs. men. Findings may represent Circadian variation in hepatic CYP3A4, intestinal P-gp and gastrointestinal mobility.2952
Bioequivalence demonstrated with 800 mg darunavir tablet to two 400 mg darunavir tablets, both given with ritonavir 100 mg.2946
Bioequivalence demonstrated with darunavir 800/cobicistat 150 mg fixed dose tablet to darunavir and cobicistat administered as single agents under fasted and fed conditions.2948
Darunavir/cobicistat
7 HIV-positive patients stable on darunavir/ritonavir were switched to darunavir/cobicistat. Darunavir concentrations were measured in matched CSF and plasma samples. Median darunavir CSF concentration were 16.4 (8.6–20.3) ng/mL with ritonavir boosting and 15.9 (6.7–31.6) ng/mL with cobicistat. Median CSF-to-plasma ratio was 0.007 (0.006–0.012) and 0.011 (0.007–0.015) with ritonavir and cobicistat boosting, respectively. All darunavir CSF concentrations exceeded the darunavir IC50 and IC90 by a median of 9.2- and 6.7-fold with ritonavir boosting and by 8.9- and 6.5-fold with cobicistat boosting, respectively.2927
Darunavir/ritonavir
In 16 HIV-positive patients, darunavir concentrations were measured in matched CSF and plasma samples. Darunavir was present in all CSF with a median level of 56.9 ng/mL (IQR 39.6, 81.4). Median CSF-to-plasma ratio was 1.4% (IQR 0.9%, 1.8%) for total darunavir and 9.4% for unbound darunavir (IQR 6.8%, 14.2%) (z = 0.57, p > 0.10). Darunavir concentrations in CSF exceeded the IC50 of wild-type HIV in all specimens by a median of 20.7-fold (IQR 14.4, 29.6).2949
CSF darunavir and ritonavir concentrations were compared in HIV-infected patients receiving darunavir/ritonavir 800/100mg once daily vs 600/100mg twice daily. HIV-infected patients on once-daily darunavir/ritonavir had significantly lower CSF darunavir trough concentrations and CSF-to-plasma ratios than patients on darunavir/ritonavir twice-daily (10.7 versus 38.2ng/ml and 0.32 versus 0.90%; P<0.05). No significant effect of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the genes encoding for blood–brain barrier transporters was noted apart from slightly higher CSF darunavir penetration in patients carrying OATP1A2 uncommon variants.2933
Median CSF darunavir concentrations were 17.08 ng/mL with a CSF:plasma ratio of 0.0084 in subjects receiving darunavir 600 mg/100 mg once daily, and 13.23 ng/mL and 0.0104, respectively, in subjects receiving darunavir 800/100 mg daily in a PK-substudy of eudraCT2011-006272-39.2940
2010 CNS Penetration Effectiveness (CPE) Score: 3 2884
Note: For more complete information and the most current safety data on antiretrovirals in pregnancy refer to the current US DHHS Perinatal Guidelines.
Darunavir/Ritonavir:
Summary of Pharmacokinetic study findings of DRV/RTV in pregnancy (DHHS Perinatal Guidelines)
Dosing Recommendations in pregnancy (DHSS Perinatal Guidelines)
Individual Pharmacokinetic Studies:
In 2 HIV-infected pregnant women receiving darunavir/ritonavir (all VL < 40 copies/mL at delivery), mean darunavir cord:mother blood concentration ratio was 0.11 (SD +/- 0.01); cord blood concentrations were below cut-off values in both samples. Mean amniotic fluid:maternal plasma ratio for darunavir was 0.16. Undetectable viral load was found in amniotic fluid and cord blood.2912
In a treatment-naïve pregnant woman, darunavir 800/100 mg QD plus tenofovir/emtricitabine once daily was well-tolerated and resulted in undetectable viral load throughout the pregnancy. Darunavir concentrations were measured in pregnancy and post-partum. At week 21, darunavir Ctrough was 1877 ng/ml, and at week 37, darunavir Ctrough was 1407 ng/mL. Calculated cord blood, amniotic and cervicovaginal fluid to mother plasma ratios were 0.11, 0.24 and 0.09, respectively.2943
In 11 HIV-positive women on cART including darunavir 600 mg/ritonavir 100 mg BID, plasma ART concentrations were measured in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters and post-partum. Total darunavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics decreased during pregnancy likely due to pregnancy-related dilution of albumin and/or AAG. Total darunavir Cmax was 28% and 19% lower while total darunavir Cmin was 43% and 86% higher during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters, respectively, compared with the postpartum period. AUC12h was 24% and 17% lower in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters compared with the postpartum period. However, there was no clinically relevant change in unbound darunavir AUC12h and Cmin occurred during pregnancy, and there was no MTCT; therefore no dose adjustment is required for DRV/rtv 600/100mg BID in pregnant women.2962
In 6 HIV-positive women treated with darunavir/ritonavir (600mg/100mg BID or 800mg/100mg QD) throughout pregnancy, darunavir exposures were significantly lower in the 3rd trimester compared to post-partum (GMR: 0.64 (0.47-0.86) for AUCtau; 0.71 (0.49-1.03) for Cmax; 0.45 (0.22-0.91) for Clast). The cord blood/maternal plasma concentration ratio was < 0.076 for darunavir.2934
In HIV-infected pregnant women receiving darunavir/r 800/100 mg QD with tenofovir/emtricitabine, steady-state PK analysis was performed in the 3rd trimester and at 12 weeks post-partum. All women had undetectable viral loads throughout pregnancy. Total darunavir Ctrough ↓ 47%, Cmax ↓ 27%, and AUC ↓ 41% in the 3rd trimester vs. postpartum. Unnbound darunavir Ctrough ↓ 24%, Cmax ↓ 29%, and AUC ↓ 24% in the 3rd trimester vs. postpartum. Mean unbound darunavir Ctrough was 66 ng/mL in the 3rd trimester.2938
In a phase IIIb study, HIV-infected women (n=17) in their 2nd trimester received darunavir 800/100 mg QD with other antiretrovirals. Total darunavir exposures decreased in the 2nd and 3rd trimester compared to postpartum (34% ↓ AUC, 32% ↓ Cmin and 34% ↓ Cmax and 35% ↓ AUC, 50% ↓ Cmin and 31% ↓ Cmax, respectively). Unbound darunavir exposures decreased in the 2nd and 3rd trimester compared to postpartum (24% ↓ AUC, 132% ↓ Cmin and 34% ↓ Cmax and 20% ↓ AUC, 38% ↓ Cmin and 16% ↓ Cmax, respectively). Unbound darunavir was >10-fold above the unbound EC50 for wild-type HIV (2.75 ng/mL) in all subjects at all time points and there was no mother-to-child-transmission. No dose adjustment is required for darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg QD in pregnant women.2936
Data was reported from a multicentre, nonblinded, prospective, phase IV study (IMPAACT P1026s) which included an arm for pregnant women (n=24) receiving DRV/RTV 800mg/100mg twice daily during pregnancy and reduced to DRV/RTV 600mg/100mg twice daily after delivery. DRV AUC(0-12h) was lower in the second trimester (geometric means ratio GMR 0.62) and third trimester (GMR 0.64) compared to postpartum. RTV AUC(0-12h) was lower in the third trimester (GMR 0.65) compared to postpartum. DRV trough (Cmin) during the second and third trimesters, including postpartum were all greater than 10-fold above the mean DRV protein-adjusted IC50 of 55 ng/mL, 5-fold above the mean DRV protein-adjusted IC50 of 550 ng/mL for resistant virus, and greater than 10-fold above the mean DRV protein-adjusted EC90 of 200 ng/mL for wild-type virus. Although lower in pregnancy compared with postpartum, protein bound DRV concentrations remained above the viral activity of HIV. The percentage of women with a viral load <50 copies/mL in the second trimester, third trimester, at delivery, and postpartum were 66.7%, 87.5%, 80%, and 70.8% respectively. There were no recorded cases of perinatal transmission of HIV. Authors concluded DRV exposure is reduced in pregnancy, and increasing DRV/RTV dose to 800mg/100mg twice daily during pregnancy failed to significantly increase DRV exposure compared with DRV/RTV 600mg/100mg twice daily.3372
Darunavir/Cobicistat:
Prezcobix (darunavir, cobicistat) is not recommended in pregnancy because of substantially lower exposures of darunavir and cobicistat during the second and third trimesters.
Cobicistat coadministered with darunavir as a fixed dose combination, in combination with a background regimen, was evaluated in a clinical trial of 7 pregnant individuals taking darunavir/cobicistat. Exposure to darunavir and cobicistat as part of an antiretroviral regimen was substantially lower during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy compared to postpartum. One out of 6 individuals who completed the study experience virologic failure with >1000 copies/mL from the third trimester visit through the postpartum period. Five individuals had sustained virologic response (<50 copies/mL) throughout the study period. There are no clinical data on the virologic response when darunavir/cobicistat is initiated during pregnancy. (Gilead Tybost product monograph)
In a Phase 3b, multicentre, open-label pharmacokinetic study (NCT00855335), the PK parameters of darunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg daily with a meal were evaluated in 7 HIV+ women in the second and third trimester vs. postpartum. Six women completed the study. In the 2nd and 3rd trimester, respectively, the total darunavir AUC was decreased by 56% and 50% and the Cmin decreased by 92% and 89%. For unbound darunavir, the AUC was decreased by 45% and 40% and the Cmin decreased by 92% and 88%. For cobicistat, the AUC was decreased by 63% and 49% and the Cmin by 83% and 83%. In 2 women, the median cord /maternal plasma ratio values were 10% and 7.7%. Viral suppression was achieved in 5/6 (83%) of women in the third trimester and at study completion. One woman was non-adherent and had virologic failure, but no drug resistance. None of the 6 infants were HIV+ infected at 16 weeks post-partum. DRV/cobi was generally well-tolerated in women and their infants.The authors concluded the decrease in darunavir exposure was more pronounced with DRV/cobi than a previous study with DRV/ritonavir (total DRV AUC decreased by 34-35% and unbound DRV AUC 20-24% lower; ritonavir AUC 46-47% lower in pregnancy). The decrease in cobi exposure in this study was similar to that observed with elvitegravir/cobi.3106 The use of DRV/cobi in pregnancy should be used with caution with close monitoring of adherence, viral suppression and potentially therapeutic drug monitoring.
No data are available.
Mutations in the protease gene associated with resistance to darunavir (IAS-USA Winter 2017 Resistance Mutations):
Some of these mutations appear to have a greater effect on susceptibility than others (e.g., I50V versus V11I).
The presence of two or more of these mutations has been associated with a decreased response to darunavir/ritonavir: V11I, V32I, L33F, I47V, I50V, I54M/L, T74P, L76V, I84V, L89V.
Darunavir is a sulfonamide; according to the manufacturer, no cross-sensitivity was observed in subjects with sulfonamide allergy. However, in one cohort study, the incidence of allergic reaction to darunavir in patients with a history of sulfa allergy was higher (odds ratio 4.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.05–17.56)2932. Use with caution in patients with a known sulfonamide allergy.
Drug-induced hepatitis (e.g., acute hepatitis, cytolytic hepatitis) has been reported with darunavir/rtv (0.5% in clinical development program, n=3063). Patients with preexisting liver dysfunction, including chronic active hepatitis B or C, have an increased risk for liver function abnormalities including severe hepatic adverse events.
Postmarketing cases of liver injury, including some fatalities, have been reported. These have generally occurred in patients with advanced HIV1 disease taking multiple concomitant medications, having comorbidities including hepatitis B or C coinfection, and/or developing immune reconstitution syndrome. A causal relationship with darunavir/rtv therapy has not been established.
If there is evidence of new or worsening liver dysfunction (including clinically significant elevation of liver enzymes and/or symptoms such as fatigue, anorexia, nausea, jaundice, dark urine, liver tenderness, hepatomegaly) in patients on darunavir/rtv, interruption or discontinuation of treatment must be considered.
Appropriate laboratory testing of hepatic parameters should be conducted prior to initiating therapy with Prezista © or Prezcobix © and patients should be monitored during treatment.
Increased AST/ALT monitoring should be considered in patients with underlying chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, or in patients who have pretreatment elevations of transaminases, especially during the first several months of treatment.
Tablets: Store between 15-30C.
Oral suspension: Store at room temperature. Shake well before use
Janssen Inc.
Note: The web app has been optimized for the following browsers: Google Chrome, Apple Safari. Other web browsers (e.g. Mozilla Firefox, Internet Explorer, Opera, etc) may experience performance issues. Please use one of the optimized browser versions, or download our mobile application.
The information in this website/app is intended for use by and with experienced physicians and pharmacists. The information is not intended to replace sound professional judgment in individual situations, and should be used in conjunction with other reliable sources of information. Due to the rapidly changing nature of information about HIV treatment and therapies, users are advised to recheck the information contained herein with the original source before applying it to patient care. Decisions about particular medical treatments should always be made in consultation with a qualified medical practitioner knowledgeable about HIV-related illness and the treatments in question.
Neither Toronto General Hospital, Alberta Health Services, the Ottawa Hospital, nor the authors and contributors are responsible for deletions or inaccuracies in information or for claims of injury resulting from any such deletions or inaccuracies. Mention of specific drugs, drug doses or drug combinations within this website does not constitute endorsement by the authors, Toronto General Hospital, Alberta Health Services or the Ottawa Hospital.
The opinions expressed herein are those of its authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Abbvie, Gilead Canada, Merck Canada Inc., and ViiV Healthcare.
We emphasize that program only checks for interactions between HIV or HCV drugs and other drugs, it will NOT check for interactions between sets of non-HIV or HCV drugs.
Also, program content focuses primarily on pharmacokinetic based interactions, and will not include comprehensive data on pharmacodynamics interactions, including QT prolongation.
Last updated: January 10, 2016
Please read these Terms, Conditions & Disclaimer carefully before using the www.hivclinic.ca website (the "Service") operated by Immunodeficiency Clinic ("us", "we", or "our").
By using this site, you signify your assent to these Terms and Conditions. If you do not agree to all of these Terms and Conditions of use, do not use this site. The Immunodeficiency Clinic may revise and update these Terms and Conditions without notice at any time. Your continued usage of the Immunodeficiency Clinic Web site (the "site") will mean you accept those changes.
Any Web sites linked from the site are created by organizations outside the Immunodeficiency Clinic. Those organizations are responsible for the information contained within their sites. We do not recommend and do not endorse the content on any third-party websites. We are not responsible for the content of linked third-party sites or third-party advertisements and do not make any representations regarding their content or accuracy. Your use of third-party websites is at your own risk and subject to the terms and conditions of use for such sites. Any specific comments regarding these sites should be directed to that individual organization.
These Terms shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of Ontario, Canada, without regard to its conflict of law provisions. Our failure to enforce any right or provision of these Terms will not be considered a waiver of those rights. If any provision of these Terms is held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court, the remaining provisions of these Terms will remain in effect. These Terms constitute the entire agreement between us regarding our Service, and supersede and replace any prior agreements we might have between us regarding the Service.
We reserve the right, at our sole discretion, to modify or replace these Terms at any time. If a revision is material we will try to provide at least 30 days notice prior to any new terms taking effect. What constitutes a material change will be determined at our sole discretion. By continuing to access or use our Service after those revisions become effective, you agree to be bound by the revised terms. If you do not agree to the new terms, please stop using the Service.
Thank you for visiting the HIV/HCV Drug Therapy Guide housed on the Toronto General Hospital Immunodeficiency Clinic Web site. General aggregate user data that will be tracked for both the web-based and mobile applications includes country of origin, new vs. returning visitor to the site, browsers used and sections of the guide that are used most frequently. Any identifying personal information will not be collected.
Accessing information from the HIV/HCV Drug Therapy Guide: This web-based application is housed on the Toronto General Hospital Immunodeficiency Clinic Web site at app.hivclinic.ca. Future updates will include an application for mobile devices also.
The Toronto General Hospital website has been in operation since 2000. The main objectives of the drug information portion of the website/app are to provide a comprehensive and centralized repository of current data on HIV/HCV drug therapy for health care professionals with a main focus on drug interactions, and to promote safe and rational prescribing of antiretrovirals and directly acting antivirals. The website/app content is updated regularly, and includes information from key international HIV/HCV conferences and recent publications in the medical/pharmacy literature.
The primary editors of the website/app content are:
The ongoing contributions of Michelle Foisy, PharmD, founding co-editor, as well as the following people are also gratefully acknowledged: Michelle Bender, Alison Wong, Bill Cornish, Margaret Ackman, Tony Antoniou, Cara Hills-Nieminen, Natalie Dayneka, Dominic Martel, Denise Kreutzwiser, Cherry Hui, Sanjeev Sockalingham.
Contact us at: app@hivclinic.ca
HIV/HCV Drug Therapy Guide. UHN- Toronto General Hospital, Immunodeficiency Clinic; 2022 [insert date cited e.g. cited 2022 Jan 10]. Available from: https://app.hivclinic.ca/
Thank you for visiting. We hope you find your visit to be worthwhile and useful.